joint case management statement northern district of california
1 min readDoe I et al v. Google LLC 3:2023cv02431 | US District Court for the this JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND DISCOVERY PLAN pursuant to the . Comments to States and Other Organizations, Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed Order. In addition, each party must restate in the case management statement the contents of its certification by identifying any persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities known by the party to have either: (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. a. The motion must comply with all rules generally applicable to Northern District motions and must: The Court may schedule subsequent Case Management Conferences, sua sponte or in response to a stipulated request from the parties. The parties shall submit Daubert briefs, if any, by June 7, 2004. If necessary, the Court will hold a hearing on Daubert and the sufficiency of expert disclosure issues on June 17, 2004. b. Commencing March 1, 2007, all judges of the Northern District of California will require the identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. See Fed. Wolk v. Verizon California Inc. - Casetext In addition, any party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it contends damages should be calculated if liability is established. Washington DC 20530. 4. Joint CMC Statement - Proposed Order (.docx, 39 KB) Abstract Of Judgment (.pdf, . R. Civ. PDF Joint Case Management Conference Statement - Prison Law Office Virginia US Federal District Courts Case Law, Court Opinions 18. To minimize burdens on non-parties, the party that serves a document subpoena on a non-party pursuant to Rule 45 shall copy any documents produced to that party by the non-party and produce them to the other side within 2 business days of their receipt. The request must include available continuance dates and may be faxed to the Clerk?s office at least three business days prior to the court hearing. Full title:DAVID WOLK, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., et al., Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The parties shall serve all motions in limine by June 9, 2004. The Commonwealth Attorney will be responsible for issuing new subpoenas for the continuance date. PDF Standing Order All Judges 1.17 - LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE P. 32. d. Defendant will not object on hearsay grounds to the admissibility of depositions of employees and former employees of Oracle taken by the Plaintiffs and defended by Oracle's counsel during Plaintiffs' investigation of the transaction underlying this action. Northern Dist. 8. 3. Jurisdiction and Service Within 2 business days of the date this Order is entered by the Court, Plaintiff United States shall submit to Defendant in electronic form a list of the documents produced by Defendant during Plaintiff's Investigation as to which a claim of privilege is in dispute, including an indication of the basis of the challenge. Stipulations of Fact. Northern District of California, the Parties hereby submit the following Joint Statement for the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for July 25, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom . 7. 16(f), Civil L.R. Decisions by both district courts may be appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. vince chhabria joint case management statement 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs and Defendant shall serve all pleadings and discovery requests, including Rule 45 subpoenas for documents, and shall deliver all correspondence on the other parties' designate by email. 13. There are two main situations in which a federal court holds jurisdiction over a case. NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS IN NON-PRISONER ACTIONS: This is available at the Standing Order For all Judges of the Northern District of California Contents of Joint Case Management Statements. Pursuant to Rule 26(f), Civil Local Rule 16-9, and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, the Parties hereby submit the following Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Initial Case Management Conference Statement: Plaintiffs contend that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claims under 28 U.S.C.. Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. The non-parties shall have 10 business days from the date of receiving notice of the Protective Order in which to review the Protective Order, designate previously-produced materials as confidential under the Protective Order, and to seek additional relief from the Court if they determine that the Protective Order does not adequately protect their confidential materials. PDF United States District Court Northern District of California Initial Joint Case Management Statement - Case Nos. Definitions "Scheduling," "discovery," or "status" conferences under Fed. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Should the resolution of these issues impact any Plaintiff's ability to complete deposition discovery, the Court will entertain a motion to extend the deadlines contained in this Order. To the extent that the Defendant's response does not satisfy Plaintiff's challenges, Plaintiff may seek additional relief from the Court, including a request for the appointment of a Magistrate. To permit timely third party discovery by Defendant, Plaintiffs' side shall also serve upon Defendant by no later than March 22, 2004, a list of those organizations (e.g., corporations and government entities) that Plaintiffs believe are like to provide witnesses who would testify at trial on Plaintiffs' behalf, live or by deposition. The parties designate the following individual(s) to receive service of all pleadings, discovery requests and delivery of all correspondence in this matter (including a principal designate, noted with an asterisk ("*")) below: b. The Pre-Trial Conference will be held on June 17, 2004, unless otherwise directed by the Court. A more recent docket listing Except in certain exempted cases, the court must set time limits for the joinder of parties and amendment of pleadings, the filing of motions and the completion of discovery. Each district court contains a special bankruptcy court that oversees bankruptcy proceedings. LR 16-10 (c) (amended eff 11/1/21). Plaintiffs maintain that the Proposed Acquisition would likely substantially lessen competition in the sale of high function HRM and FMS software, and result in higher prices, less functionality and decreased support. Case Management and Scheduling Order - California United States A list of Northern District Judges and links to their Standing Orders can be found on the court's website. 3. P. 16 and 26 shall be designated as "case management conferences" in this Court. Any request to reschedule the date of the conference shall be made in writing, and by stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) days before the date of the conference and must be based upon good cause. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions. Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, and a proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 15. Chief, Antitrust Bureau Office of the Attorney General of New York 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, NY 10271 Counsel for Plaintiff States, The Case Management Statement and Proposed Order is hereby adopted by the Court as. The availability of nationwide service of process, however, does not make a witness that is otherwise "unavailable" for purposes of Fed. Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California: Contents of Case Management Statement Rules and General Orders Federal Rules Local Rules Local Rules Attorney Advisory Committees Admiralty & Maritime Local Rules ADR Local Rules Civil Local Rules Criminal Local Rules Habeas Corpus Local Rules Patent Local Rules General Orders Documents identified on or added to any party's exhibit list that are not timely objected to pursuant to this Paragraph shall be presumed to be authentic and admissible. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no later than the date specified in FRCP 26 (f) (amended eff 12/1/15), counsel must file a Joint Case Management Statement addressing all of the topics set forth in the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California (amended eff 11/1/18) - Contents of Joint Case Management Statement, which can be found on the courts website. Depositions of each party's experts shall be completed by June 11, 2004. f. If required by Fed. Antitrust Division Disclaimer: The materials and information on this website do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. 2741 case no. 19. 3. Discovery Period. Select a judges name to open that judges web page, then select Standing Orders from the left navigation bar. When this happens, a plaintiff can choose the court system that they prefer. In the event the Court declines to enter Defendant's proposed Paragraph 4.a.3, Defendant proposes April 15, 2004 as the date for Plaintiffs' disclosure of trial witnesses, and April 29, 2004, for Defendant's disclosure of trial witnesses. They serve lifetime terms. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex . P. 26(f). b. The parties have met their obligation to meet and confer to discuss the parties' positions on the topics required under the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, dated July 1, 2011 and revised May 8, 2013. R. Civ. Devon R. Paige, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge, Hon. 16-9, the parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Case Management Statement and Proposed Order. Documents produced after May 21, 2004 that a party wishes to add to its exhibit list must be added within 3 business days of their receipt. Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings. Except in categories of actions exempted by local rule, the district judge or a magistrate judge when authorized by local rule must issue a scheduling order: A represented party must authorize at least one of its attorneys to make stipulations and admissions about all matters that can reasonably be anticipated for discussion at a pretrial conference. 804, available under those rules. All judges of the Northern District of California require identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS IN NON-PRISONER ACTIONS: Northern Dist. During the interim period described in subparagraph a, materials exchanged pursuant to Paragraph 4 may only be reviewed by counsel of record for the parties. Objections to any written discovery shall be served within 10 days of service of the written discovery request, and complete responses and/or responsive productions (subject to any objections that have not been ruled upon) shall be served within 20 days of service. PDF Standing Order for All Judges of The Northern District of California PDF United States District Court for The Northern District of California John Doe I, John Doe II, Jane Doe I, Jane Doe IV, Jane Doe V, Jane Doe II and Jane Doe III, US District Court for the Northern District of California, 28 U.S.C. The parties will exchange objections to the exhibits to be offered by the other party no later than June 2, 2004. Any party's principal designate served by email shall promptly confirm receipt. 10. a. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS The parties shall exchange reports conforming to the requirements of Fed. P. 26(f) prior to the Case Management Conference with respect to those subjects set forth in Fed. PDF NTRODUCTION ERVICE OF THIS RDER - Archive.org Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated motions. OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal: Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff Failure to comply with this Order or the Local Rules of this Court may result in sanctions. for the joint case management statement. This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. PDF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN - California Courts R. Evid. R. Civ. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Norfolk Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court, Individual Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Homepages, Payment Plan Policies for Fines and Costs, Pay Criminal and Other Cases in a Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Forms, Guardians Ad Litem for Children in District 4, Hon. Case Management - Southside Health District PDF United States District Court Northern District of California During the interim period described in subparagraph a, materials exchanged pursuant to Paragraph 4 may only be reviewed by attorneys for Latham & Watkins (outside counsel for Oracle) and counsel for the United States and the Plaintiff States. Lynchburg Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court The Court will hold a hearing on motions in limine on June 17, 2004. > Southside Health District > Case Management. The serving party will telephone the other parties' principal designate(s) at the time the materials are sent for service to alert them that the materials are being served. 18. However, email service that is delivered after 5:30 pm Pacific Time, shall be treated as if it was received the following business day. Such amended, final lists shall be submitted to the Court. PDF XAVIER BECERRA ECTOR ALDERAS Attorney General of California The parties anticipate that each side shall need approximately 10 days to submit its respective case. By no later than March 22, 2004, Defendant shall serve upon Plaintiffs a list of those organizations (e.g., corporations and government entities) that Defendant believes are likely to have discoverable information that Defendant may use to support its claims or defenses. Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Courts Informational Pamphlet. If appropriate, the court may require that a party or its representative be present or reasonably available by other means to consider possible settlement. Copyright RPCD Holdings LLC 2003-2023 exclusive of the text of government codes. Except as otherwise provided by the Protective Order and consistent with the terms of Paragraph 9 below, the disclosures set forth in Paragraph 4.b.1 shall commence forthwith upon entry of the Protective Order by the Court, shall be made on a rolling basis, and shall be completed within 10 business days of the entry of the Protective Order. 15. The federal district courts are the trial courts in the federal court system. The parties request that this case be exempted from participating in any Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") process because they believe that no ADR process is likely to deliver benefits to the parties sufficient to justify the resources consumed by its use. The parties shall exchange preliminary lists, not to exceed 25 per side, of the witnesses they intend to call live at trial, the order they will be called, a brief description of the subjects to which they will testify and the estimated time of direct examination by May 10, 2004. To be submitted pursuant to this Court's standing order. The parties will endeavor to resolve any objections regarding the authenticity or admissibility of all exhibits (including demonstratives and those used during the case in chief, cross-examination or rebuttal) in advance of their use. The parties and affected non-parties may stipulate to additional time for individual depositions. 17. Rebuttal experts shall be designated by Plaintiffs no later than April 19, 2004. Opposition to motions in limine shall be filed by June 14, 2004. Case management and education services are offered, with home and office visits for pregnant women and infants up to 2 years old. Pre-Trial Submission. The conference may be conducted by the magistrate judge assigned to the case. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex . Case Number: 4:2023cv03277: Filed: June 30, 2023: Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California: Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore: Nature of Suit: Other Fraud: Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. Plaintiffs' proposed version of the Protective Order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. b. 19. If a non-party seeks additional relief from the Court, materials for which additional protection has been sought will not be produced to anyone other than those persons identified in subparagraph b below until the Court has ruled. Absent stipulation or good cause shown, no Oracle witness previously deposed in the course of Plaintiffs' Investigation shall be deposed again for more than one additional day. 13. Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the trial. Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Each party shall appear personally or by counsel prepared to address all of the matters referred to in this Order and with authority to enter stipulations and make admissions pursuant to this Order. This action arises from an unsolicited bid by Defendant Oracle Corporation ("Oracle") to acquire PeopleSoft, Inc. ("PeopleSoft") (hereinafter referred to as the "Proposed Acquisition"). The parties shall exchange proposed stipulations of fact no later than June 7, 2004. To the extent not covered by the above, Plaintiffs also shall, under the terms and conditions set forth below, produce all correspondence, documents, data, email, statements, declarations, affidavits, oral examination transcripts, depositions or any other materials exchanged between Plaintiffs and PeopleSoft, a party to the Proposed Acquisition, or its counsel. Plaintiffs' rebuttal report shall address Plaintiffs' responses to Defendants' claims, including claims related to the efficiencies or synergies that would arise from the proposed merger and Defendant's claim that it has remedied any competitive harm. c. Depositions of non-party witnesses shall be no more than one day in length. 23, to issue trial subpoenas that may run into any other federal district requiring witnesses to attend this Court. Continuances governed by Rule 8:14. 16. Service of Pleadings and Discovery on Other Parties. However, a defendant may ask to remove a case from state court to federal court if it could have been filed in federal court. Except as otherwise provided by the Protective Order and consistent with the terms of Paragraph 9 below, the disclosures set forth in Paragraph 4.a.1 shall commence forthwith upon entry of the Protective Order by the Court, shall be made on a rolling basis, and shall be completed within 10 business days of the entry of the Protective Order. You're all set! Sometimes both state and federal courts may have jurisdiction. 1. 23-1(b))(.pdf), Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) no. In accordance with Civil Local Rule ("L.R.") 16-9, the parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Case Management Statement and Proposed Order. Lynchburg Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Home; Virginia's Court System; Online Services ; Case Status and Information; Court Administration; Directories; Forms; Judicial Branch Agencies; Programs; Memoranda supporting the motions in limine shall be no more than 10 pages in length. oakland division . Jay L. Himes, Esq. Notice Requesting Case Management Conference - ADA Access Cases (.pdf, 40 KB) . Except as otherwise stated herein, the parties are in agreement as to the provisions of this Order. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google, US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, US District Court for the Western District of Virginia. See terms of use for more details. R. Civ. R. Civ. PDF In the United States District Court for The Northern District of If there are multiple plaintiffs or multiple defendants, no plaintiff can be a citizen of the same state as any defendant. Each party must provide counter designations of deposition testimony no later than June 11, 2004. 2. Southside Health District; Locations; Administrative Services. P. 45 at least 5 days before the return date. 1-4. a. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 11. LR 16-2 (a) - (c) (amended eff 11/1/21). JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT - CASE NO. Defendant shall produce these Proposed Acquisition Materials regardless of whether those materials were received informally or through compulsory process. Exhibit lists need not include exhibits used solely for purposes of cross-examination or rebuttal. 2. Expedited Schedule: Whether this is the type of case that can be handled on an expedited basis with streamlined procedures. U.S. Department of Justice Defendant proposes the following language: 3. No non-party materials shall be disseminated to anyone beyond those persons identified in subparagraph b below until the passage of this 10-day period. a. Interrogatories shall be limited to 15 for Plaintiffs' side and 25 for Defendant, including sub-parts. In civil matters, if the continuance is granted, it will be the responsibility of the attorneys to notify all parties that they are excused. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 ) 15-CV-4959 (YGR) 14 RIANA BUFFIN and CRYSTAL ) 15 PATTERSON, on behalf of themselves and ) JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT 16 others similarly situated, ) STATEMENT 17 ) 18 Plaintiffs, ) 19 ) 20 v. ) 21 ) Federal question jurisdiction arises when a case involves the U.S. Constitution or federal laws, such as the statutes in the U.S. Code. VACCINES The State's program to vaccinate people in CDCR custody is moving ahead. A subscription to PACER is required. Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Opposition to Motion for Discovery Sanctions, Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to Amend Pleading, Reply in Support of Motion for Continuance or Extension.
Delta Force Pistol Qualification,
What Is A Pastoral Society In Sociology,
Second Epistle To The Corinthians,
Articles J